Ad enquiry

Comments

New Zealand Bank Posted:
retail banking is all what an economy needs, I mean what are the governments are doing on this.
(view article + comment)
New Zealand Bank Posted:
I don't understand why is the reserve bank so weak and poor !
(view article + comment)
mist Posted:
Perhaps IMF formulas are not accurate for this area.
(view article + comment)
mist Posted:
" tax increases in one area supports decreases in another is correct" it can only be correct if it is true. Observation and repeated sampling has proven that the hypothesis is faulty. Tax increases in one area are not causally linked to decreases elsewhere - not "possibly", not "it adds up". "Philosophically" it _might_ but testing proves it does not. One could even say "it should" but we both know an equivalent term for "it should" is "doesn't" What drives taxes down is political advantage. If a political party has an agenda they don't want the public to look at too closely, then sweeters (aka "bait") is put forwards. Tax decreases is a classic. This can be achieved because the tax increases and tax decreases are not linked. They're not zero sum nor do they have causal or proportional connection. This is because the "buffer solution" in the middle is that endless hole. tax increase means more spending. tax decrease means more government borrowing. The in/out relationship is decoupled, through size and power in the marketplace (financial economy). The abysmal productivity is because of the massive overheads from doing business in NZ. personal taxes double the rates of the US, huge taxes on goods and services, massive levies on critical imports, price gouging in the energy and communications markets, interest rates 300 to 500 times that of the US!, and not nearly the number of cost writeoffs either (subscriptions, training, vehicle rebates). Nor would get the 401k option either, of rebuying into the same market and not having to pay CGT. Oh and horrendous ever inflating local rates, again much much higher, for less, than our foreign counterparts (excepting Scandinavian countries). Our "abysmal production" is a result of this overtaxation being sand in the gears of the economy, wearing it down and rubbing out real growth. Putting CGT makes that problem worse!! And to sum up... your last comment.... O.M.G. You think that improving our situation, of people not wanting to save or invest in government buggered industry is to bugger up the ability to accumulate equity in useful assets??????? Where do you think people are going to get savings or capital to do anything??? (including retiring when their earning ability is severely reduced!) Put it in finance companies???????????? Buy the oh-so-excellently-performing NZX? In the few companies squeaking by?
(view article + comment)
John Walley Posted:
I think we agree on the lending without security issue. It might well be that the intent to change the source of tax and not increase government spending is fictitious, however given the provision that government spending does not change the statement that tax increases in one area supports decreases in another is correct. The broader point is demonstrated by the Romney situation where he pays tax at half the rate of his salaried staff - and in the USA capital gains carry a 15% tax rate - it will be interesting to see how that one pans out. For New Zealand the economic distortions supported by the complete absence of capital gains tax are clear from our abysmal productivity record. Why save, why invest in production (taxed interest paid or via the income statement) when money can be made without tax from passive asset appreciation.
(view article + comment)

Recent News

Spain beset by bank crisis, recession - Stuff, 18 May 2012 Spain's borrowing costs shot up at a bond auction on Thursday, after economic data confirmed the country is back in recession and reports of an outflow of deposits from nationalized Bankia hammered its share price.

Why Europe Still Needs Nuclear Deterrence - Project Syndicate, 18 May 2012 At NATO’s summit in Chicago this month, determining how to ensure a reliable level of nuclear deterrence will be high on the agenda. But, even before those discussions occur, it is clear that there are powerful reasons for maintaining NATO’s current mix of defense capabilities, including US...

Lower Economic Growth Seen for Britain - New York Times, 17 May 2012 The Bank of England cut its growth forecast and said inflation in the near term would be higher than previously expected.

Monetary policy for dummies - Stuff, 17 May 2012 These days, a business journalist's inbox is clogged by continuous bursts of competitive nay-saying emanating from the Labour, Green and New Zealand First parties in response to the ongoing welter of poor economic news.

More on Keen vs. Krugman - Steve Keen's Debtwatch, 17 May 2012 David Burchell provides his interpretation of the Keen vs. Krugman debate on RadioNational Counterpoint with Michael Duff and Paul Comrie-Thomson.

John Kay: Reducing the risk of a systemic failure in the banking system http://t.co/AOZgHA6s
9/05/2012 11:30 a.m.
Member Profile: K9 Natural http://t.co/mScOk6nu
7/05/2012 4:17 p.m.
RBNZ must continue to add tools to monetary policy http://t.co/ubJ0GgqE
4/05/2012 2:41 p.m.
Quarterly Survey: Sales up overall but exports down http://t.co/HaVoEYER
4/05/2012 9:21 a.m.


22/10/10

Don't cut trade training support


Print-friendly 0 comment(s) Posted in: In the media

Skill shortages are likely to reappear with the Government removing $55 million from apprenticeship training and reallocating it to fund university places say the New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA). There are problems with the industry training structure which has meant that numbers on these courses have been down, but these problems must be addressed not swept under the carpet. This report details some of the issues.

NZMEA Chief Executive John Walley says, “Before the cut apprentice training was underfunded meaning that the costs are prohibitively high for employers even in the good times. It can take four years for apprentices to become fully productive and there is no guarantee that the apprentice will stay with their employer at that point.”

In 2008, 55% of the tertiary education funding was given to the universities and they are responsible for 27% of the students; industrial training organisations received 8% of total government funding, combined with cash contributions from industries, and they trained 46% of the students.

“Trade and technician skills feed through immediate benefits to industry, the community and the economy. In hard times short term needs take precedence but down the track low levels of apprentice training will be a major problem. We went through this in the early 1990’s and that hole has not yet been repaired. Trade training has significant spillover benefit and this should be recognised through more support for this effort not less.”

“High levels of productivity are essential for sustainable growth and trade skills are one of the main drivers for productivity, especially for a country like New Zealand with a small population. More effort is required to ensure that the trade training is viable for employers by increasing the support for trade training via the Industry Training Organisations.”
 



tags: industry training, itos, skill shortages

comments

0 Comment(s)



No comments have been posted yet

Name:
Email:
Website URL:
Comment:
Remember Me:
Email Replies:
Please play the ball not the man.