Ad enquiry

Comments

New Zealand Bank Posted:
retail banking is all what an economy needs, I mean what are the governments are doing on this.
(view article + comment)
New Zealand Bank Posted:
I don't understand why is the reserve bank so weak and poor !
(view article + comment)
mist Posted:
Perhaps IMF formulas are not accurate for this area.
(view article + comment)
mist Posted:
" tax increases in one area supports decreases in another is correct" it can only be correct if it is true. Observation and repeated sampling has proven that the hypothesis is faulty. Tax increases in one area are not causally linked to decreases elsewhere - not "possibly", not "it adds up". "Philosophically" it _might_ but testing proves it does not. One could even say "it should" but we both know an equivalent term for "it should" is "doesn't" What drives taxes down is political advantage. If a political party has an agenda they don't want the public to look at too closely, then sweeters (aka "bait") is put forwards. Tax decreases is a classic. This can be achieved because the tax increases and tax decreases are not linked. They're not zero sum nor do they have causal or proportional connection. This is because the "buffer solution" in the middle is that endless hole. tax increase means more spending. tax decrease means more government borrowing. The in/out relationship is decoupled, through size and power in the marketplace (financial economy). The abysmal productivity is because of the massive overheads from doing business in NZ. personal taxes double the rates of the US, huge taxes on goods and services, massive levies on critical imports, price gouging in the energy and communications markets, interest rates 300 to 500 times that of the US!, and not nearly the number of cost writeoffs either (subscriptions, training, vehicle rebates). Nor would get the 401k option either, of rebuying into the same market and not having to pay CGT. Oh and horrendous ever inflating local rates, again much much higher, for less, than our foreign counterparts (excepting Scandinavian countries). Our "abysmal production" is a result of this overtaxation being sand in the gears of the economy, wearing it down and rubbing out real growth. Putting CGT makes that problem worse!! And to sum up... your last comment.... O.M.G. You think that improving our situation, of people not wanting to save or invest in government buggered industry is to bugger up the ability to accumulate equity in useful assets??????? Where do you think people are going to get savings or capital to do anything??? (including retiring when their earning ability is severely reduced!) Put it in finance companies???????????? Buy the oh-so-excellently-performing NZX? In the few companies squeaking by?
(view article + comment)
John Walley Posted:
I think we agree on the lending without security issue. It might well be that the intent to change the source of tax and not increase government spending is fictitious, however given the provision that government spending does not change the statement that tax increases in one area supports decreases in another is correct. The broader point is demonstrated by the Romney situation where he pays tax at half the rate of his salaried staff - and in the USA capital gains carry a 15% tax rate - it will be interesting to see how that one pans out. For New Zealand the economic distortions supported by the complete absence of capital gains tax are clear from our abysmal productivity record. Why save, why invest in production (taxed interest paid or via the income statement) when money can be made without tax from passive asset appreciation.
(view article + comment)

Recent News

Spain beset by bank crisis, recession - Stuff, 18 May 2012 Spain's borrowing costs shot up at a bond auction on Thursday, after economic data confirmed the country is back in recession and reports of an outflow of deposits from nationalized Bankia hammered its share price.

Why Europe Still Needs Nuclear Deterrence - Project Syndicate, 18 May 2012 At NATO’s summit in Chicago this month, determining how to ensure a reliable level of nuclear deterrence will be high on the agenda. But, even before those discussions occur, it is clear that there are powerful reasons for maintaining NATO’s current mix of defense capabilities, including US...

Lower Economic Growth Seen for Britain - New York Times, 17 May 2012 The Bank of England cut its growth forecast and said inflation in the near term would be higher than previously expected.

Monetary policy for dummies - Stuff, 17 May 2012 These days, a business journalist's inbox is clogged by continuous bursts of competitive nay-saying emanating from the Labour, Green and New Zealand First parties in response to the ongoing welter of poor economic news.

More on Keen vs. Krugman - Steve Keen's Debtwatch, 17 May 2012 David Burchell provides his interpretation of the Keen vs. Krugman debate on RadioNational Counterpoint with Michael Duff and Paul Comrie-Thomson.

John Kay: Reducing the risk of a systemic failure in the banking system http://t.co/AOZgHA6s
9/05/2012 11:30 a.m.
Member Profile: K9 Natural http://t.co/mScOk6nu
7/05/2012 4:17 p.m.
RBNZ must continue to add tools to monetary policy http://t.co/ubJ0GgqE
4/05/2012 2:41 p.m.
Quarterly Survey: Sales up overall but exports down http://t.co/HaVoEYER
4/05/2012 9:21 a.m.


2/9/11

Export sales recover


Print-friendly 1 comment(s) Posted in: In the media

The latest New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA) Survey of Business Conditions completed during August 2011, shows total sales in July 2011 increased 13.5% (export sales increased by 16.4% with domestic sales increasing 11.2%) on July 2010.

The NZMEA survey sample this month covered NZ$439m in annualised sales, with an export content of 46%.

Net confidence rose to -22, up from the -38 result reported last month.

The current performance index (a combination of profitability and cash flow) is at 96, up from 93 in June, the change index (capacity utilisation, staff levels, orders and inventories) went down to 99 from 102 in the last survey, and the forecast index (investment, sales, profitability and staff) is at 103, up on June’s result of 99.75. Anything less than 100 indicates a contraction.

Constraints reported were 78% markets, 11% staff and 11% production capacity.

Staff numbers for July increased year on year by 2.8%.

“Export sales have recovered this month although continuing currency pressures will reduce returns,” says NZMEA Chief Executive John Walley. “Favourable conditions remain for those exporting to Australia and Asia driving the sales expansion.”

“The indexes and confidence measures are still a concern with the performance index in particular showing the loss of profitability and the confidence rating remaining in negative territory where it has been for six of the seven months surveyed so far this year. The number of pessimists has strong grown strongly as the no change group has contracted.”

“Overall the demand for New Zealand’s exports is holding up for the moment, but with the global outlook very uncertain this could change quickly.”

“Comments from the survey covered reduced margins due to the high New Zealand Dollar and concerns over whether demand from overseas markets will hold up. Christchurch respondents also noted that ongoing impacts from the earthquakes were upsetting staff and worrying customers.”

“With the issues in the United States and Europe it is likely that exchange rate pressures will worsen over the next few months. This will continue to threaten the viability of exports to those areas.”

“A response to the actions of other countries who seek to weaken their currencies should be a priority for the Government and the Reserve Bank. The exchange rate as it stands is a punitive tax on exporters and encourages spending overseas; hardly what is needed to rebalance the economy.”

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:



tags: survey, business confidence, exchange rate, reserve bank, export margins

comments

1 Comment(s)



Dave Wolland - 13 September 2011 at 20:52 p.m.
Wheel Of Fortune

If you want to make things or grow produce commercially in NZ, one of the biggest difficulties you have to deal with is the way our government chooses to use a floating exchange rate to help regulate our economy. I wonder whose bright idea it was to use our unstable dollar in this way and delivering Kiwi business profitability into the hands of fund managers who handle the savings of Chinese banks, Japanese housewives and Belgian dentists etc.

To get a take on what is happening overseas, just imagine how you would have to cope if the NZ internal economy operated like the global economy - where districts (or provinces) had their own exchange rate that was changed daily by professional gamblers in the Sky City Casino. To further complicate matters, some districts would also set their exchange rates to ensure a continual economic advantage over other districts.

If you travelled around NZ, imagine how frustrating it would be trying to work out the going rates every day so you could control your spending and income expectations in localities only a few hours from your front door. I think it would be incredibly complicated, inefficient and unfair.

Obviously, in our domestic economy, we need a single exchange rate for commerce to run efficiently along with one main language, commercial and social laws etc. Perhaps there is a solution here to help the World's economic woes by eventually having one world currency and the same commercial standards. Fair trading agreements would also need to be negotiated to establish a real level playing field – in the same way The EEC takes in new members perhaps.

A logical place for us to start would be to get an exchange rate parity and a real free and fair trade deal with Australia; then (in steps), negotiate the same sort of arrangement with the U.S.A., Canada, Europe, Japan and the rest of the World. If a shared exchange rate became established, as it does within our domestic economy, we would know at last the real costs of goods and services.

This concept might help stem the wealth transfer taking place from the West to Asia and allow wealth to be generated within each country influenced by its own natural advantages. It might also help environmentally by exposing the real cost of transport and energy.

Initially, in New Zealand, the value of exports might fall in traditional markets. However quotas and tariffs would probably disappear and greater access would assist the potential to create improved economies of scale and that would reduce costs. Spending power within New Zealand would increase as well and so many input costs would decline.

I heard President Obama on the radio saying that his government will strive to lift his country out of the recession by reforming the finance sector and promoting ‘Fair and Free Trade”. With our much smaller economy we could succeed years before he does and show the world that it can be done.

Name:
Email:
Website URL:
Comment:
Remember Me:
Email Replies:
Please play the ball not the man.