David Thompson Posted:
So very, very true. It beggars belief that we consider ourselves to be a developed nation when so much of our economy is based on selling milk powder or logs. BTW, I own a Plinius amplifier (my second) that drives a set of Theophany speakers.
(view article + comment)
David Thompson Posted:
A robust but sobering report. It concerns me that confidence is rising, yet sales and exports are down and "manufacturers and exporters are still lagging behind other sectors". Surely we should wait until we're earning more money before we start spending more?
(view article + comment)
siemens Posted:
Yes true! The only thing that will never die in this world is the nature and its science behind it. Great post.
(view article + comment)
Kieran Ormandy Posted:
Thanks for the question Steven, Germany has seen increases in manufacturing employment since 2009, and Switzerland has had stable manufacturing employment between 2006 – 2011, even in the face of ongoing Euro-zone issues. Korea has seen increases in manufacturing employment since 2008 and Israel experienced large increases since 1998, while being stable over the last 4 years. Singapore has had increases in manufacturing employment over the last two years. These countries all value their manufacturing sectors and work to protect them, this is reflected in the above numbers and their performance through the GFC. Note data around the above examples was sourced from OECD labour market stats.
(view article + comment)
John Walley Posted:
Point one: you should have no doubt what our Association says publically represent the views of our members. Point two: we don’t knee jerk responses, if you trace back our comments around NZPower you will see them link all the way back to our research in 2004 and 2005. All that material is fully linked from our comments above. Point three: you will note our comments on major users, sadly the same advantage does not accrue to smaller industrial users. The perverse incentives of the LRMC approach in all this are well known. Point four: the NZMEA is not like any other Association in New Zealand we admit only manufacturers and exporters into membership, and our public expressions are the views of that restricted membership.
(view article + comment)

Recent News

House price increases slow as new lending rules begin to take effect - QV - Stuff Business, 1 Nov 2016 New Zealand's hot housing market is showing signs of cooling down.

Global debt hits $152 trillion - New Zealand Herald, 6 Oct 2016 Global debt has hit a record high of US$152 trillion (NZD$217 trillion), weighing down economic growth and adding to risks that recovery could turn into stagnation or even recession, the International Monetary Fund has warned.In...

Business owners confident in economy - survey - 3 News Business, 4 Oct 2016 Kiwi businesses were more optimistic about the state of the economy and their own activity in the September quarter, even as their profits were squeezed. ...

Households losing wealth as debt keeps going up - Stuff Business, 4 Oct 2016 New Zealanders have become poorer over the past year.

Signs of challenges for exporters - NZMEA survey - Voxy, 6 Sep 2016 The latest New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA) Survey of Business Conditions completed during August 2016, shows total sales in July 2016 decreased 15.27% (year on year export sales decreased by 20.48% with domestic sales decreasing by 6.03%) on July 2015.

Ad enquiry


Crisis what crisis?

Print-friendly 0 comment(s) Posted in: Blog only

What is going on in manufacturing across New Zealand? Listen to some and there is no issue; listen to others there is a crisis. Who should be listened to? What is the reality? Where is the evidence? What do the numbers say?

What we see depends a good deal on where we stand, what we hear and who we talk to, and in politics, the picture that must be painted. All sides of the discussion marshal argument and statistics to bolster their position and the observer is left to choose; one number is much like the next and if bigger is better why not choose the big number? Why not feel happy when misery is the alternative and the choice seems to carry little penalty. Be happy, don’t worry is easier than the other choice.

One element of my role is to accurately reflect the experience of our membership, a membership 100% made up of manufacturers and exporters, I look at the numbers and ask: do these accurately reflect the day to day experience of our members, if not I ask what is wrong with the numbers? I don’t look at the numbers and somehow revise the experience to fit. What you see depends on where you look, what you hear and who you listen to.

The Manufacturing Inquiry investigated a whole range of concerns, dismissing those concerns underlines the marginalisation as identified by the Inquiry. “Crisis what crisis” with both John Key and Steven Joyce quoting the May PMI results as a clear sign manufacturing is doing well, and using the number to support the denial of the problem and the Inquiry report.
The single PMI result has some validity but like any survey it is subject to sampling error bias, a single point cannot establish a trend and fundamentally the PMI does not measure real sales. Our own survey is biased to exporting manufacturers and does measure real sales across the sample. Measurements at a system level, again subject to sample bias, come from Statistics New Zealand and here we can see high level decline over the long run. At the system or supply chain level current policy settings are threatening the existence of many manufacturing export firms.

I want to look at some data series that we believe gives an accurate picture of the manufacturing sector; data that matches our day to day experience built up overtime, talking and interacting with manufacturing export firms.

According to Statistics New Zealand data, it appears that manufacturing as a percentage of GDP as well as percentage of people employed in the sector has steadily shrunk in the past 20 years. Some people see this decline is an inevitable development process, and that it can naturally be offset by an expansion in the services sector, we see this as a “post-industrial fantasy”.

If we look further into this apparent decline in manufacturing, and separate manufacturing by the level of processing; we can uncover a deeper story. In real 2003 dollars we see:

In the last decade, unprocessed and processed primary manufacturing has seen steady growth. In contrast, simply and elaborately transformed manufactures have struggled. But what does this difference mean?

This paints a picture of increasing reliance on simple, primary production and processing. Simply and elaborately transformed manufactures capture creativity and innovation to add value; ultimately providing more for the economy in the form of economic activity and highly paid, innovative jobs. This is a loss of complexity in our economy that will have negative effects on our future prosperity and quality of life. This effect can be seen in the OECD better life index, which compares various measure of quality of life between countries. New Zealand scores well in most respects, but scores only 3.3 out of a possible 10 in terms of income. This is due to our average household incomes sitting below the OECD average, as well as having relatively high income inequality.

Employment data from the March Household Labour Force Survey showed the number of people employed in manufacturing falling by nearly 11,000, year on year. These are important jobs for our economy, as jobs in the manufacturing sector have higher average and median wages than that for the economy as a whole. The loss of these jobs and output has a high flow on effect to other sectors.

Politicians structurally opposed to the Manufacturing Inquiry have said anyone claiming there is a manufacturing crisis, is really manufacturing a crisis. The fact is for those who submitted to this inquiry did so out of passion for their business and the sector, speaking from their own personal experiences, which would be foolish to dispute. It is easy to point out the odd one or two who are currently doing well, but this does nothing for those who are struggling under current policy settings.

Would it not be better to engage with the real experience? Leaning on selected numbers will only continue the indifference and push more manufacturers out of business or offshore.

How can this be positive for the future of New Zealand? 

tags: manufacturing, manufacturing inquiry, politics, exports, elaborate, value added


0 Comment(s)

No comments have been posted yet

Website URL:
Remember Me:
Email Replies:
Please play the ball not the man.