What is the Real Economy?
The ‘Real Economy’ is made up of the farmers, manufacturers, tourist operators and service providers that sell to the world and generate New Zealand’s external income. As Angus Tait once said, “There are three ways to generate wealth; you farm things, you make things or you dig things up.” That is the essence of the real economy.
[ read more ]



mist Posted:
Perhaps IMF formulas are not accurate for this area.
(view article + comment)
mist Posted:
" tax increases in one area supports decreases in another is correct" it can only be correct if it is true. Observation and repeated sampling has proven that the hypothesis is faulty. Tax increases in one area are not causally linked to decreases elsewhere - not "possibly", not "it adds up". "Philosophically" it _might_ but testing proves it does not. One could even say "it should" but we both know an equivalent term for "it should" is "doesn't" What drives taxes down is political advantage. If a political party has an agenda they don't want the public to look at too closely, then sweeters (aka "bait") is put forwards. Tax decreases is a classic. This can be achieved because the tax increases and tax decreases are not linked. They're not zero sum nor do they have causal or proportional connection. This is because the "buffer solution" in the middle is that endless hole. tax increase means more spending. tax decrease means more government borrowing. The in/out relationship is decoupled, through size and power in the marketplace (financial economy). The abysmal productivity is because of the massive overheads from doing business in NZ. personal taxes double the rates of the US, huge taxes on goods and services, massive levies on critical imports, price gouging in the energy and communications markets, interest rates 300 to 500 times that of the US!, and not nearly the number of cost writeoffs either (subscriptions, training, vehicle rebates). Nor would get the 401k option either, of rebuying into the same market and not having to pay CGT. Oh and horrendous ever inflating local rates, again much much higher, for less, than our foreign counterparts (excepting Scandinavian countries). Our "abysmal production" is a result of this overtaxation being sand in the gears of the economy, wearing it down and rubbing out real growth. Putting CGT makes that problem worse!! And to sum up... your last comment.... O.M.G. You think that improving our situation, of people not wanting to save or invest in government buggered industry is to bugger up the ability to accumulate equity in useful assets??????? Where do you think people are going to get savings or capital to do anything??? (including retiring when their earning ability is severely reduced!) Put it in finance companies???????????? Buy the oh-so-excellently-performing NZX? In the few companies squeaking by?
(view article + comment)
John Walley Posted:
I think we agree on the lending without security issue. It might well be that the intent to change the source of tax and not increase government spending is fictitious, however given the provision that government spending does not change the statement that tax increases in one area supports decreases in another is correct. The broader point is demonstrated by the Romney situation where he pays tax at half the rate of his salaried staff - and in the USA capital gains carry a 15% tax rate - it will be interesting to see how that one pans out. For New Zealand the economic distortions supported by the complete absence of capital gains tax are clear from our abysmal productivity record. Why save, why invest in production (taxed interest paid or via the income statement) when money can be made without tax from passive asset appreciation.
(view article + comment)
carl Posted:
"a Capital Gains Tax means less tax in other areas or lower borrowing for the same amount of government spending. " Only in your wildest dreams, mate. a drip or a bucketful does not change an infinite hole. The only reduction in tax you would see is short-term, and done to create a perception. Once the elephant was sold it'll be put back up, often with extra claw-back clauses to catch more cash. And Banks do lend for shares - but at lower rates of coverage. 50% for business assets is rule of thumb, 80% for first mortgages, 20-25% for basic unencumbered share parcels. with additional security and reasonable ability to cover debt servicing compliance. That's the ball. So why's the man (original poster) running with such blatantly obvious fouls????
(view article + comment)
DGS Posted:
SEE ABOVE
(view article + comment)


Recent News

BusinessDesk: "US economy remains vulnerable to shocks from Europe" - Interest, 3 Feb 2012 Tweet It's been a great start to the year and investors found little reason to change much today, ahead of January's US jobs report due tomorrow. While Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told lawmakers there were signs of improvement in the...

Oi! You’ve missed a bit... - Economist - Babbage, 3 Feb 2012 HOW much easier it would be to locate and repair damage to bridges, wind turbines and other dumb objects if those objects could tell you what the problem was. Researchers at the University of Strathclyde, in Britain, led by Mohamed Saafi, are therefore trying to give them a voice, by devising a...

Survey of Banks Shows a Sharp Cut in Lending in Europe - New York Times, 3 Feb 2012 The figures raise concern that Europe is on the verge of a credit crunch that would cause a deeper recession than had been expected.

TYSON: America’s Three Deficits - Project Syndicate, 3 Feb 2012 TYSON: America’s Three Deficits The US faces painful choices about how to close its long-run fiscal gap, and a credible plan should be decided now and implemented promptly – but only after the economy has recovered. For the next few years, the priorities of fiscal policy should be jobs,...

Dollar hampers 'knowledge intensive' exports - Stuff, 2 Feb 2012 The strong kiwi has stymied growth of high value exports in "knowledge intensive manufacturing", according to briefing papers from MED.


MED report highlights problems for high value exporters http://t.co/VoLBDWMv
3/02/2012 12:37 p.m.
Sales bounce at year end http://t.co/VtI5uuSq
3/02/2012 9:56 a.m.
Monetary policy matters http://t.co/45wTSnWd
2/02/2012 1:25 p.m.
New RBNZ Governor and prospects for policy change http://t.co/TiVh9HQY
31/01/2012 2:25 p.m.







07/05

Survey - Hope triumphs over uncertainty as confidence improves


Print-friendly 0 comment(s) Posted in: In the media

The latest New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA) Survey of Business Conditions completed during April 2010, shows total sales in March 2010 decreased 0.5% (export sales decreased by 13% with domestic sales increasing 11%) on March 2009.

The NZMEA survey sample this month covered NZ$572m in annualised sales, with an export content of 41%.

Net confidence rose to 64, up from the 36 result reported last month.

The current performance index (a combination of profitability and cash flow) is at 103.5, down from 105.5 in February, the change index (capacity utilisation, staff levels, orders and inventories) is at 102, down on February’s result of 103, and the forecast index (investment, sales, profitability and staff) went up to 107.25 from 106.25 last month. Anything less than 100 indicates a contraction.

Constraints reported were 91% markets and 9% production capacity.

Staff numbers for December decreased year on year by 8%.

“Confidence has continued to grow but falling sales and job numbers demonstrate that the confidence is built on the hope of more sales and more jobs, not the reality of current performance,” says NZMEA Chief Executive John Walley. “Export sales are continuing to suffer with firms selling to North America and Europe experiencing difficulties with both markets and the currency. Domestic sales are faring better but there is a concern that some of the demand is due to restocking supply chains rather than any genuine recovery."

“This just goes to show that confidence indicators are a poor proxy of what is really going on in the economy; we hope the RBNZ sees this and stops talking up the recovery and the currency. I am not quite sure who is served by the RBNZ talking up the recovery; why say things that reduce returns to the real economy?”

“The tradeable economy still needs monetary policy stimulus, and the longer it stays in place the more economic rebalancing will happen. Given the absence of inflationary pressure in the economy, the general weakness of the recovery and the reluctance of Governments elsewhere to withdraw stimulus, there is little reason for the RBNZ to change its current position.”

“The budget looks destined to be another triumph of rhetoric over reality. The fiddling round the edges hinted at so far will have little positive impact on the real economy. The fact that Australia has also failed to make any significant tax changes does not excuse the timid reaction to the Tax Working Group’s report for example. A monetary policy review is also long overdue with potential Official Cash Rate rises likely to cause the already overvalued exchange rate to appreciate further.”

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:

 

From: To:



tags: survey, sales, staff, confidence

comments

0 Comment(s)



No comments have been posted yet

Name:
Email:
Website URL:
Comment:
Remember Me:
Email Replies:
Please play the ball not the man.